Search for: "Carr v. Carr"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Following Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [2001] 1 All ER 952, Carr J held that the Court has discretion to impose an injunction where it is necessary and appropriate in the circumstances. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 12:33 pm
"Supreme Court Landmark Case Baker v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 1:23 am
Healey Sports Cars Switzerland Ltd v Jensen Cars Ltd [2014] EWHC 24 (Pat) is a Patents Court, England and Wales, decision of Katfriend Henry Carr QC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) on 24 January 2014. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
If they do not, you might be penalized on costs, as hinted by Carr J. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
This low threshold, in the context of industrial applicability, was supported by the Supreme Court in HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 where “plausible” was used alongside “educated guess” and “reasonably credible”. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 12:55 pm
Carr appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 5:29 am
It was only too bad that the event was not held after the latest decision of Mr Justice Carr in the TQ Delta v Zyxel saga was published. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Carr and its early one person, one vote progeny were wrongly decided. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:50 am
Carr, No. 14-449. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:04 am
Carr, and Kansas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:17 am
Carr. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
Carr on October 8, 2009, in the special case of Carr v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
[1] Moody, et al., v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
. ---: Brief for Petitioner Thomas Carr ---: Brief for National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner ---: Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Earlier case which will be tested: CALDER v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
In the special case of Carr v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
7-1-2010 7th Circuit:From Sentencing, Law & Policy:A number of helpful readers have alerted me to a notable split Seventh Circuit opinion today in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
The 2017 trial saw the joined claims of Illumina & Sequenom (& Ors) v Premaitha and Illumina & Sequenom v Ariosa (& Ors). [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 12:41 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
In State v. [read post]
