Search for: "Case v. Hatch"
Results 21 - 40
of 932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 5:15 am
Bayer AG v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:45 am
I don’t know if you would call me an expert, but I’ve studied many, many cases involving Paragraph IV Certifications under Hatch-Waxman. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 9:52 pm
For the latest version of the Hatch-Waxman Tracker, click here. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
" Braintree Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
FergusonPlessy v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
While the Supreme Court may have expanded the reach of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor,” the Medtronic and Merck cases only involved pre-marketing FDA approval activity. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
While the Supreme Court may have expanded the reach of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor,” the Medtronic and Merck cases only involved pre-marketing FDA approval activity. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
United Therapeutics Corporation v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
While the Supreme Court may have expanded the reach of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor,” the Medtronic and Merck cases only involved pre-marketing FDA approval activity. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
The worst-case scenario is easy to envision based on opinions to date. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:17 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
Proveris Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:12 pm
By Andrew Williams -- In a second case involving the Hatch-Waxman regulatory scheme decided by the Federal Circuit on Monday, the Court held in Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 9:56 pm
Actavis (previously FTC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:31 pm
The case arose over Celgene's multiple-myeloma drug pomalidomide (Pomalyst). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:18 pm
§ 271(e)(1) was the occasion for the Federal Circuit to illustrate the continued debate over the scope of the safe harbor enacted as part of the Hatch-Waxman Act in Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
