Search for: "Castell v State" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The federal district court, southern district of New York, has raised doubts about the facts asserted in the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:35 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
.), Executive federalism in the EUSeptember 20, 2011: Anastassia V. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The case was investigated by the DEA, the PRPD, and the FBI, with the collaboration of the San Juan Municipal Police, and prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Olga Castellón, Mariana Bauzá and Maritza González. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:00 am by Marta Requejo
  Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Patil, Trushant Shah, Faramarz Robeny and Fredo Joseph (collectively the "plaintiffs") appeal from a June 2, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.), granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee City of New York (the "City") and denying the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
In the case, a class action titled Cruz v TD Bank, N.A., 10 Civ 8026 (opinion by Hon. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 10:45 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Kevin Castel yesterday denied Eric Prokopi's motion to dismiss in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 8:26 am by Söğüt Atilla
This is because the purpose of invalidity proceedings based on absolute grounds for invalidity is to “enable EUIPO to review the validity of the registration of a mark and to adopt, where necessary, a position which it should have adopted of its own motion” [citing Castel Frères v OHIM, C-622/13 P, para 42]. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Ambu AS (Patently-O) CAFC: Preamble held not limiting because body of claim sets forth complete invention: American Medical Systems v Biolitec (Filewrapper) District Court E D Michigan: General allegations of deceptive intent fail to state a claim for false marking: Josephs v. [read post]