Search for: "Castillo v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
Here is how the opinion starts: In this sentencing appeal, appellant, Ynocencio González-Castillo ("González") -- a Dominican national who pled guilty to unlawfully entering the United States after being previously deported -- challenges the sentence imposed on him by the district court. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 7:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Fifield v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
” Castillo, 804 F.3d at 367 (quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Three published criminal opinions yesterday -- 1) United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
United States,” said Colon. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
The Court was also “troubled” that defendants were offering to sell contact lenses into the United States using Mon Ros’ AZURE and AMARILLO marks. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 4:43 pm
Montel Aetnastak, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:00 pm
Below, Alexandra Lampert of Stanford Law School recaps Monday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
This month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected Fifield’s bright line test in the case of Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Castillo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
CPL 240.20(1)(h) requires the prosecutor disclose "Anything required to be disclosed, prior to trial, to the defendant by the prosecutor, pursuant to the constitution of this state or of the United States. [read post]
BECAUSE WE HAVE THE POWER TO FUCK OUR CLIENTS - The Jefferson Parish Indigent Defender Board Edition
1 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
Castillo then asked the Court of Appeal, which looked at cases from the United States Supreme Court (Williams v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:10 pm
Saying that it is reluctantly applying Castillo v. [read post]