Search for: "Castle v. Castle" Results 21 - 40 of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 9:42 am by autumn
Supreme Court’s decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0071, 2009 MT 229, ROBERT EDWARDS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:04 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (3): In Citizens State Bank of New Castle v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 7:49 am
Harris v Perry and Another Court of Appeal “A judge imposed an unreasonably high standard of care in holding that children playing on a bouncy castle hired by parents for a children's party required uninterrupted supervision. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:52 pm by Simon Gibbs
I mentioned the other day some of the anomalies thrown up by the Court of Appeal's recent judgment that general damages should be increased by 10% where judgment is given after 1 April 2013. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:46 am
What if the castle doctrine's presumption of a reasonable fear were extended to [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:09 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lavender v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Bolton, 2016 WL 3919056 (NYAD 3 Dept 7/21/016)Filed under: Accessory Uses, Current Caselaw - New York, Uncategorized [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
Rucker, in dissent, relied on the formerly well-founded belief that one’s home is one’s castle: In Miller v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 8:02 pm by Patricia Salkin
Crown Castle Fiber, LLC v City of Charleston, 2020 WL 1330711 (D SC 3/23/2020) [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:32 am
Employee alleges disciplinary action was initiated in retaliation for his suing the employerMatter of Chiara v Wells, 61 AD3d 973In another action involving the same parties, Jeffrey Chiara sued the Town of New Castle to recover damages for alleged unlawful discrimination, disparate treatment, and having a hostile work environment. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]