Search for: "Cato v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Ct. 1367, 1374 (2020), which stated in passing that “the § 315(b)-barred party can join a[n existing IPR] proceeding initiated by another petitioner. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
(Cato Institute.)The Cato Institute has recently published the latest edition of the excellent Freedom in the Fifty States, its ranking of state and local policies on economic and personal freedom, authored by political scientists William Ruger and Jason Sorens. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:58 pm
(NA)Yesterday, the Cato Institute and I filed our amicus brief in Devillier v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
This practice did not end until well after the Supreme Court struck down race-based school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 1:54 pm
What's left of the dormant Commerce Clause after National Pork Producers v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
Oral argument before the Second Circuit is not yet scheduled but will likely occur sometime in early 2024.The post Amicus Briefs in <i>Volokh v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm
In Devillier v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:44 am
Today The Hill published my article on Texas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Examples include: Evidence of the original meaning of the Contracts Clause and ways it might be reinvigorated through litigation Potential theories under the Citizenship Clause State constitutional anti‐monopoly and anti‐gift provisions and other causes of action unique to state law or state constitutions The Ninth Amendment Questions left open by North Carolina Dental Board and ways in which parties can use the Sherman Act to hold… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 8:05 pm
New Vik Amar piece, forthcoming in the Cato Supreme Court Review. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court Moore v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:42 pm
It is long established and ordinarily uncontroversial that speech can lose the protection of the First Amendment if, for example, it seeks to intimidate a public official into shirking a legal duty, or if it consists of the submission of forged documents to a government agency, or if it solicits or facilitates crime generally (this past term's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:56 pm
Earlier today, I submitted an amicus brief to the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]