Search for: "Cause v. Dept. of Rev." Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
 259 A.D.2d 1004, 688 N.Y.S.2d 295 (4th Dept.1999). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Rev. 369, 392 (2010) (footnote omitted).The plaintiffs’ side has sporadically argued that genetic markers should be warned about or, in some cases designed around, although we doubt the latter is even possible. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
See, e.g., Matter of Cline v Donovan, 72 AD3d 471, 472-472 (1st Dept 2010) (dissolution should not have been granted due to question of fact as to whether petitioner was member of LLC); Caplash v Rochester Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLC, 63 AD3d 1683 (4th Dept 2009) (plaintiff had standing to dissolve LLC because his resignation as member was not effective before he moved for dissolution). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
For a good cause: reforming the good cause exception to notice and comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. 18 Geo. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Rev. 2550, 2550 (June 2001).AlabamaEx parte Household Retail Services, Inc., 744 So.2d 871, 880 n. 2 (Ala. 1999); Ex parte Exxon Corp., 725 So.2d 930, 933 n.3 (Ala. 1998).AlaskaWe didn’t find anything useful along these lines under Alaska law.ArizonaOsuna v. [read post]