Search for: "Center For Independent Living v. ACT Dist."
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
Hence, this claim has no viability independent of the first two and stands or falls on the strength of those claims. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Upon entry, Miller encountered plaintiff, who had slept on the living room couch near the front door. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Upon entry, Miller encountered plaintiff, who had slept on the living room couch near the front door. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
The Project consists of two care units, cottages, and a clubhouse on 20 acres, and was part of a larger development area including a local medical center, a senior assisted living facility, medical office buildings and a local retail shopping center. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
It appeared in the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse Update earlier this year, before our appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Woodland, Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Independent Living Center of Southern California, et al. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Dist. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
Dist. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
Center Moriches Union Free School Dist., 508 U.S. 384 (1993), Rosenberger v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:33 pm
” “The Counties’ position just bucks common sense: reasonable observers have reasonable memories, and our precedents sensibly forbid an observer ‘to turn a blind eye to the context in which [the] policy arose,’” said Souter, citing another case, Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
If one of the goals of the foster care and juvenile justice system is to prepare youth to live independently, make informed decisions, and navigate the world, then the interests of society are best served by involving and praising the voices of youth in these decisions. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
"From TM v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:11 pm
Dist. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The project site was located within an existing shopping center and surrounded by commercial uses. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Dist. [read post]
