Search for: "Chambers v. Department of Correction"
Results 21 - 40
of 356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:12 pm
In Hamm v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
More than thirty years ago, Oregon Department of Corrections Director Michael Francke was murdered in front of his office building. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Held, Steyn J had had no proper basis to find that the publishees of Ms Cadwalladr’s statements were within her “echo chamber” and of “no consequence” to Mr Banks. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
This must be correct, but leaves solicitors in a very difficult position. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
In the Matter of New York Civil Liberties Union [CLU] v New York City Department of Correction [DOC], 2023 NY Slip Op 00930, the Appellate Division noted that the personal privacy exemption in Public Officers Law §87(2)*allows state agencies to protect sensitive matters "which are of little or no public interest, and which may include unsubstantiated allegations," citing Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Off. of the Mayor, 194 AD3d… [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 11:15 am
So you don’t miss it, there appear to be at least 3 clear mistakes in the court’s opinion: Twitter as ICS provider 230’s application to the SCA breach of contract being both covered and not covered by 230 I’m not sure what’s going on in this judge’s chambers, but this is a suboptimal situation that will likely need correction. * * * I get increasingly nervous when I see new rulings involving Twitter because, at any point, we will start see… [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Nothing in the record on appeal permits this Court to depart from the assumption that juries generally follow explicit instructions: see R. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
The controlling case, Richey v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
The journalist Elizabeth Bruenig notes: The Alabama DOC gave the gathered reporters no explanation for the long delay, or for his strange demeanor in the chamber….John Hamm, the corrections department commissioner, said, in somewhat scattered fashion, that he couldn’t “overemphasize this process. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 7:29 pm
[internal citations omitted] Chevron, U.S.A. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 7:35 am
See Farah v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:05 am
In Maisonet v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
