Search for: "Chambers v. Nation" Results 21 - 40 of 2,734
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:20 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The Grand Chamber (by a majority of 12:5) held that there was a violation. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber (by a majority of 12:5) held that there was a violation. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:26 pm by Kirk A. Hornbeck and Brandon Marvisi
On October 28, 2019, the US Chamber of Commerce, along with two other business-oriented groups—the National Retail Federation and the Retail Litigation Center, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:00 pm
Below, Stanford student Micah Block discusses Thursday’s decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:38 pm
The recommendation, filed on Friday in support of a Chamber of Commerce petition, argues that the National Labor Relations Act preempts the California statute, and that an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit created a circuit split in holding otherwise. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:10 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 11-551 Amicus Chamber of Commerce 11-551 Ramah Amicus National Congress of American Indians et al No. 11-551 Arctic Amicus in Ramah 3-26-12 [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:10 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: 11-551 Amicus Chamber of Commerce 11-551 Ramah Amicus National Congress of American Indians et al No. 11-551 Arctic Amicus in Ramah 3-26-12 [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm by David Kopel
A decision of the Grand Chamber (17 members, en banc) is binding on all nations which have signed the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:00 am by Trusts EstatesProf
On Monday, Lanny Davis and David Rivkin filed a bipartisan amicus brief on behalf of the National Black Chamber of Commerce (NBCC) with the Supreme Court in the Stern v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Soren Dayton, Erica Newland
  These bills are the first holistic rethink of national security laws from the 1970s—namely the War Powers Resolution of 1973, the National Emergencies Act of 1976 and the Arms Export Control Act of 1976—since INS v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 347 (AAC) [not on Bailii yet] Just a quick note on this Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case, which found that the Art 12 Ibrahim/Teixeira rights applied to an A8 national who had been working under registration, but had not completed the 12 months before becoming unemployed and claiming Income Support. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 5:31 am by NL
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v JS (IS) [2010] UKUT 347 (AAC) [not on Bailii yet] Just a quick note on this Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) case, which found that the Art 12 Ibrahim/Teixeira rights applied to an A8 national who had been working under registration, but had not completed the 12 months before becoming unemployed and claiming Income Support. [read post]