Search for: "Chambers v. US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
These dark sides of the Internet have increasingly been recognized by governments, the courts, and by the numerous individuals and organizations who have sought justice for criminal, intellectual property, tortious, extremist, and other illegal acts committed using the Internet. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
On a wider level, how do they relate to one another, cognate fields like international criminal law, or social processes? [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 21 May 2012 there was an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Sharpe considers that section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 “was used completely inappropriately to prosecute [Paul] Chambers“. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Metrish Issue: Whether states and state officials may be subject to suit for damages for violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(Securing Innovation) Why blog about intellectual property? [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Discussion of Catherine Tremblay’s article on cost approach: (IP finance), US Congress cites free expression as reason ICANN must remain controlled by US government: (IP Justice), A new organisation around IP in your company? [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
§26 takes effect immediately and shall be applicable only to those individuals who serve as officers or employees in the executive chamber of the governor on or after such date. [read post]