Search for: "Chambers v. Wilson*"
Results 21 - 40
of 192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
SKELOS, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm
The Board’s reliance on Government of India v Taylor [1955] AC 491 (HL) in this context is unhelpful. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Justices ask about the wording of the 2011 AV Referendum Act and Chambers QC confirms that he will provide the relevant provision which shows the different wording used, which confirms that Parliament is handing over its sovereignty (in contrast to that used in the 2015 Act). 14:17: Dominic Chambers QC reiterates that the 2015 Act contained no requirement for the UK government to implement the result or set a timeline in relation to the referendum. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:11 pm
(in support of petitioner) Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
Lord Wilson however referred to S v United Kingdom (2009) 48 EHRR 1169, where the Grand Chamber held that the applicants’ reasonable concern about future use was relevant to whether interference had already arisen. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 4:45 pm
And cogently added that my praise for all of the hard work on the opinion that this chambers did below will undoubtedly be highly appreciated in the context of a decision reversed with a comment about the statute's "plain meaning". [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am
” Sales LJ held that any further guidance was unnecessary because the correct approach to instructing experts is found in the Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chambers of the First-tier and Upper Tribunal 2014. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Doughty Street Chambers has announced the sudden and unexpected death of leading media law silk, Heather Rogers KC. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Lady Hale at para 21 quoted with approval the observation of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Neulinger v Switzerland (2010) 28 BHRC 706, para 131, that “the Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum but must be interpreted in harmony with the general principles of international law”. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:04 pm
Chamber of Commerce Amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar Related posts: Ford Files Cert. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 3:31 pm
Global business organizations including the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea, NetChoice, Asian Trade Center, and Asia Internet Coalition also filed objections to the bill. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 12:18 pm
The other opinion was 9-0 in Houston Community College v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
The whistleblower case, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
