Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 21 - 40
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
State DA 19-0226 2020 MT 163 Civil – Postconviction Champagne v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:41 am
It is now part of the LVMH Group the interests of which range from champagne to fashion. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
Roederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 1:59 pm
It also requires that the allegations tend to diminish the plaintiff's reputation, and the decision Friday by Judge Paul Crotty (S.D.N.Y.) in Lindell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:00 pm
See Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
The next case, Moore v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:31 am
Stewart v Franmara Inc [2012] NZHC 683 (26 March 2012) Stewart v Franmara Inc no.2 [2012] NZHC 1771 (19 July 2012) Breach of confidence – Patent infringement –Jurisdiction – whether New Zealand court has jurisdiction to decide infringement, in the US, of a US patent, where ownership and validity are not at issue In what might be described as a ‘courageous’ ruling, a judge of the New Zealand High Court in Auckland has found, in Stewart v… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
In his hopeful post on the oral argument yesterday in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 2:16 pm
That’s how its decision in Champagne Louis Roederer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
In Jerry Bailey v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
In Jerry Bailey v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:06 pm
”The case cite is Commission v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 7:00 pm
In Champagne Metals v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The latest installment is Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 7:05 am
Keithley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
First, they explore the district court ruling in Salim v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
At oral argument in TransUnion, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:17 pm
Answer: Probably not, according to Hubbs v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
But in allowing in principle the human rights counter claim, the Urbaser v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
CJEU rules that ice cream sold as ‘Champagner Sorbet’ can be branded as ‘Champagne’Katfriend Nedim Malovic (Sandart & Partners) reports on a judgement released earlier this week (Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co.OHG, C-393/16) where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) reviewed relevant EU legislation on protected designations of… [read post]
