Search for: "Chan v. No Named Respondent" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by David Fraser
For that reason, we need clear rules so that this ability is only used where it is reasonable to do so, in accord with our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.This morning, the Ontario Superior Court released its important decision in R. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 9:00 am
Aaron Caplan (author of “Free Speech and Civil Harassment Orders,” 64 Hastings L.J. 781 (2013), and one of the amici in Chan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:44 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Chan Police Officers Aren’t Liable For Investigating Cyberstalking and Revenge Porn–Keaton v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 3, Trademark Leah Chan Grinvald, Constructive Consent Courts adopt as evidence of fame the number of users = strength = fame. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s that the law purports to grant TM for reasons that many respondents don’t seem interested in. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: He heard an argument for reduced damages for unauthorized users who create value, but that doesn’t implicate blocking copyrights as in Gracen v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
The title of the paper, No Bitin’ Allowed, focused on some of the informal ways in which hip hop artists both regulate and respond to copying and appropriation of lyrics and sampling. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Ray Beckerman
The People)TABLE OF CASES (Alphabetical by case name)Andersen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
§ 51, the FELA wrongful death statute, to state that recovery by a named beneficiary in a wrongful death action shall "include nonpecuniary damages for loss of [read post]