Search for: "Chang v Rodriguez"
Results 21 - 40
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
(See Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:26 pm
That brings me to a new case on the rights/remedy gap, Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
Rodriguez v Instagram, LLC (California Superior Court of San Francisco Case CGC-13-532875) (February 28, 2014). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:35 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
As the Court held in People v Lyon, AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 06892 [10/01/10], where "a defendant's testimony conflicts with evidence precluded by a Sandoval ruling, "the defense opens the door' on the issue in question, and the [defendant] is properly subject to impeachment by the prosecution's use of the otherwise precluded evidence" (People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646; see People v Rodriguez, 85 NY2d 586, 591). [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 3:05 pm
A California federal district court recently granted partial dismissal of privacy claims brought by several Google users in Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:45 am
The opinion in Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Court Blesses Instagram’s Right to Unilaterally Amend Its User Agreement–Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
At first, they told her to wait in the hall, but then allowed her in so that she could change clothes. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
State v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
In April 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:17 am
In April 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 10:39 am
However, the development has to be for an extraordinary change and the changes alleged here – a Napue claim and Pena-Rodriguez – were not prejudicial or not extraordinary. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:06 pm
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Earlier this week, in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 12:50 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:37 am
Rodriguez v (1) Minister of Housing (2) Housing Allocation Committee [2009] UKPC 52 is perhaps most remarkable for needing to get as far as the Privy Council before a sensible decision was made. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:37 am
Rodriguez v (1) Minister of Housing (2) Housing Allocation Committee [2009] UKPC 52 is perhaps most remarkable for needing to get as far as the Privy Council before a sensible decision was made. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
