Search for: "Chang v. Tennessee Valley Authority"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
The Court held that the rule of Tennessee Valley Authority, requiring repeal of a law to be explicit, did not apply because section 318 did not repeal, but “amended” or changed the environmental laws applicable to a specific case and therefore did not violate the constitutional prerogative of the courts. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
The interesting part about this case, at least as far as manufacturing is concerned, is that the case began with a 2004 lawsuit in which the plaintiffs — eight states, New York City, and three land trusts – brought public nuisance claims against four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:32 pm
Plaintiffs (eight states, a city, and three land trusts) brought federal common law public nuisance claims seeking injunctive relief against five of the largest carbon emitters in the United States (four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
The court did not reach the Tennessee Valley Authority’s prudential standing arguments and did not base its decision on the political question doctrine defense advocated by petitioners. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
The remainder of the Circuit Court ruling, clearing the lawsuit to proceed against four power companies and the Tennessee Valley Authority, was overturned by the vote of the eight Justices taking part Monday. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
” We address in this opinion the question whether the plaintiffs (several States, the city of New York, and threeprivate land trusts) can maintain federal common law public nuisance claims against carbon-dioxide emitters(four private power companies and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm
Tennessee Valley Authority. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm
Connecticut, the Supreme Court is faced with the next, inevitable step in a line of climate change litigation including, most notably, Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am
In 2006, North Carolina, on behalf of its citizens, sued the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and alleged that TVA’s coal-fired power plants were a public nuisance. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:02 am
“To classify climate change as a tort would trigger a massive shift of institutional authority away from the politically accountable branches and to the courts, which we think would be inconsistent with separation of powers,” defense counsel presented in its rebuttal. * * * * * The American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:41 pm
As explained in a prior post, the Obama Administration also argued for reversal of the Second Circuit decision on behalf of defendant Tennessee Valley Authority, albeit on different grounds than the other defendants. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
The five were the Tennessee Valley Authority, the government’s major power-generating entity, plus four major electricity-generating companies: American Electric Power Co., Cinergy Corp. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
Tennessee Valley Authority: the problem with state nuisance law in the regulation of out-of-state emissions standards. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:00 pm
Debtors Had a Claim for Wrongful Termination In Jackson v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
Now to the back-stories and legal gossip: first, the litigating states (including California) and environmental interests were sorely disappointed when the Obama Administration’s Solicitor General–representing the Tennessee Valley Authority–filed a brief urging the Court to grant certiorari in the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
Defendants included: American Electric Power Company, Inc., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
Connecticut involves the use of a common law theory of nuisance: [Five companies] that were claimed to be the largest sources of greenhouse gases — four electric power companies and the Tennessee Valley Authority — were sued by eight states, New York City, and three land conservation groups... [read post]
