Search for: "Chantell Sackett" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 10:42 am by Rosa Schechter
This gives support to property owners everywhere in the United States, not just Idaho, and not just Michael and Chantell Sackett. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
      Chantell and Michael Sackett own a small lot in a built-out residential subdivision that they graded to build a home. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:52 am by Rosa Schechter
This gives support to property owners everywhere in the United States, not just Idaho, and not just Michael and Chantell Sackett. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Paul M. Hauge
The Idaho landowners, Michael and Chantell Sackett, received a compliance order after filling a portion of their residential lot near Priest Lake in preparation for the construction of a home. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  The case arose when Chantell and Mike Sackett bought two-thirds of an acre near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:56 am
  The case arose when Chantell and Mike Sackett bought two-thirds of an acre near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:00 am by Jeff Lorenzo
Mike and Chantell Sackett purchased an approximately half-acre parcel of land near Priest Lake, Idaho, on which they planned to build a house. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:51 pm by Steve Davies
Chantell and Michael Sackett have won their Supreme Court case with nary a dissent. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Sean Moloney
  The case was brought by an Idaho couple, Mike and Chantell Sackett, who attempted to build a home on their property near Priest Lake, Idaho, where the EPA claimed there existed protected wetlands. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court stressed that it was not deciding whether Michael and Chantell Sackett will win their court case, but only that they had a right to file it at their choosing, now that the EPA “compliance order” is final. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Sackett deals with an Idaho couple, Mike and Chantell Sackett, who graded a lot and built a house in the northern part of the state in 2007, described as "their dream house near a lake. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by JD Hull
In what could become an important decision regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s enforcement rules, several Supreme Court justices appeared sympathetic to the cause of Mike and Chantell Sackett in their battle against the EPA and the Clean Water Act. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
  Chantell and Mike Sackett bought a vacant lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
  Chantell and Mike Sackett bought a vacant lot near Priest Lake, Idaho, intending to build their home there. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:28 pm by Steve Davies
EPA had ended, Professors Richard Lazarus of Harvard and Richard Frank of UC-Davis confidently predicted an overwhelming victory for Chantell and Michael Sackett. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Chantell and Michael Sackett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:30 am
Schiff, Senior Staff Attorney, National Litigation Center, Pacific Legal Foundation; Counsel for Chantell and Michael Sackett, Petitioners Virginia S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:19 am by Lyle Denniston
Schiff, a lawyer for Chantell and Michael Sackett, the Priest Lake, Idaho, couple that has been fighting with EPA for four years over their plans to build a home on a lot they own — a lot that EPA says has wetlands on it. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by val_kimber
Monday, January 9, 2012 10-1062 SACKETT, CHANTELL, ET VIR v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
It is difficult to argue that this portrayal of the plight of Chantell and Michael Sackett made no difference to the Justices. [read post]