Search for: "Charles E. Still" Results 21 - 40 of 1,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
In this first-of-its-kind JURIST “global dispatch” on a single topic, 15 law students and young lawyers from around the world, all of them JURIST correspondents from outside of Israel and Palestine, join together to offer a  panoramic view of how the current Gaza conflict is unfolding in their countries and regions. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
Still, the company’s actions can be viewed as mitigating the risk of severance that defies market norms. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
Still, the company’s actions can be viewed as mitigating the risk of severance that defies market norms. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
“[W]e must now urgently develop a broad regulatory regime for over-the-counter derivatives. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Still, the human self-projection into the digital, and now more consciously the world around them, produces profound changes in the way that the human (and humanity) understands themselves and the way they order the world they inhabit. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:47 pm
It is a communal act of solidarity aiming to inspire active members, gain new converts, and generally firm up the faith by calling on all sinners (whether or not baptized) to repent their sins (Generally Charles G. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:50 am by Keith E. Whittington
If Charles Murray can be shouted down, can a professor assign students to read The Bell Curve? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Scope 3 emissions are those from its supply chain, both upstream and downstream.[22] Perhaps the greatest controversy over the SEC proposal was its inclusion of Scope 3 emissions, and it is still uncertain whether the final rule will include them.[23] The draft rule required them only if they are determined to be “material,” which has led to a considerable amount of confusion.[24] SB 253 does not require materiality. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The majority opinion was preordained, but the dishonesty and cowardice of that opinion and the concurrences are still breathtaking. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The government argues that the decision below is correct and “th[e] question arises far less often than [Rudisill] suggests. [read post]