Search for: "Check v. Mitchell" Results 21 - 40 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2008, 12:40 pm
Mitchell, supra, 824 N.E.2d at p. 650 [suppressing the evidence where “the sole apparent purpose of the detention is to check for a warrant”].) [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:22 pm by Jon Sands
Mitchell, 824 N.E.2d 642 (Ill. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
The court concluded, however, that the state had not shown that a total ban on smudging ceremonies is the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling interest in safety and security.In Mitchell v. [read post]