Search for: "Chevron Phillips Chemical Company" Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2011, 2:23 pm by John McFarland
A supplier, service company or operator is entitled under the draft rule to claim trade-secret protection for a chemical additive. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
The jury decided that Union Carbide and Chevron Phillips Chemical were both liable for designing a defective product and for failing to warn their employees. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:25 am
In a case against major industrial players Chevron Phillips Chemical and Union Carbide Corporation, Thomas Brown Jr. was awarded $322 for future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and punitive damages. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:25 am
In a case against major industrial players Chevron Phillips Chemical and Union Carbide Corporation, Thomas Brown Jr. was awarded $322 for future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and punitive damages. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:25 am
In a case against major industrial players Chevron Phillips Chemical and Union Carbide Corporation, Thomas Brown Jr. was awarded $322 for future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and punitive damages. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 pm
Brown claimed to have inhaled asbestos while mixing drilling mud that was sold and manufactured by Chevron Phillips Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:20 pm
Brown, a 48-year-old former oil field "roughneck," argued that Brown had inhaled asbestos dust on the job, and that the manufacturers and sellers of the asbestos (defendants Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. and Union Carbide Corp.) failed to take proper steps to warn of the dangers of the materials. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:58 pm by Joseph Lamy
The defendants in this case were Chevron Phillips Chemical and Union Carbide Corporation, both of whom developed and marketed asbestos products for decades. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
EPA cited the companies for violating the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), which requires companies that manufacture, use or process more than a threshold amount of listed toxic chemicals to file an annual toxic chemical release form with EPA and the state. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The agreement, filed in federal court in Kansas, resolves violations of the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements at the company’s Jeffrey Energy Center, a coal-fired power plant near St. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:27 am
Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., L.P., the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment in favor of Chevron on an employee's claim that she was discriminated against and denied reasonable accommodation for her chronic fatigue syndrome. [read post]