Search for: "Childs F. Burden" Results 21 - 40 of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Legal abortion obviously conveys a “benefit” in a comparative sense: not abortion as an absolute good but legal abortion as compared to a back-alley butcher or to state-enforced child-bearing. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
 Will prosecutors ever be able to meet their burden to show that alleged child pornography is not manipulated imagery? [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Under the Hague Convention, a petitioner bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence a child's habitual residence at the time of the contested removal. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Laura Valade
Parent’s Act of Domestic Violence Under ARS § 25-403.03(F), a family law judge who finds the parent committed domestic violence must first be satisfied that “parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child’s emotional development,” whether or not a protective order exists. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Laura Valade
Parent’s Act of Domestic Violence Under ARS § 25-403.03(F), a family law judge who finds the parent committed domestic violence must first be satisfied that “parenting time will not endanger the child or significantly impair the child’s emotional development,” whether or not a protective order exists. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am by Joel R. Brandes
De La Roca, 910 F.3d 92, 96 (3d Cir. 2018) The District Court determined that Appellee met this burden. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:47 am by Kate Fort
As set forth above, the relevant provisions of the ICWA and the MIFPA are essentially identical; that is, each requires proof by “clear and convincing evidence” to remove an Indian child and place him or her into foster care, 25 USC § 1912(e), MCL 712B.15(2); proof sufficient to satisfy the trial court that active efforts have been made to terminate parental rights, 25 USC § 1912(d), MCL 712B.15(3); and proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” that continued… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:18 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A prima facie case simply shifts the burden of going forward to the respondent, however, the burden of proving child maltreatment always remains with ACS. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:57 am by Stephen Pitel
Pitel, Faculty of Law, Western University The Supreme Court of Canada has released its decision in F v N, 2022 SCC 51 (available here) and the decision offers some important observations about the law on international child abduction. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:22 am by Kyle Persaud
At the court hearing on relocation, the parent objecting to the relocation has the burden of proving that relocation is not in the child’s best interests. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:28 pm by Steve Worrall
(j) A copy of each surrender specified in subsection (a) of this Code section, together with a copy of the acknowledgment specified in subsection (f) of this Code section and a co [read post]