Search for: "Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm by John Lewis
Justice Scalia found the origin of the “effective vindication” exception in dictum in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The plaintiff’s complaint unsurprisingly had to name nearly two dozen defendants, from General Motors, to Daimler Chrysler, to Ford, to Napa Auto Parts, to Pneumo Abex, successor of American Brake Shoe and Foundry, founded 1902. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
” The auto alliance includes General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota and eight others. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Notwithstanding Concepción, the Supreme Court previously acknowledged that ‘not ... all controversies implicating statutory rights are suitable for arbitration’” (citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:25 pm by Myriam Gilles
Unlike the state law unconscionability challenge that underlay Discover Bank, the vindication of rights challenge takes as its starting point the Supreme Court’s recognition in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm by Randall Reese
• Millennium Multiple Employer Welfare Benefit Plan• Motors Liquidation Company (f/k/a General Motors Corporation)• MSR Resort Golf Course LLC• Muzak Holdings LLC• Nortel Networks Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
SC90866 (Mo.banc 2010).Article 3, §40(30) provides that “[t]he General Assembly shall not pass any local or special law…where a general law can be made applicable. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
Chrysler Corp., 834 So.2d 1026, 1044 (La. [read post]