Search for: "Church of Lukumi v. City of Hialeah" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am by K. Hollyn Hollman
City of Hialeah, which banned the ritualistic animal sacrifices of the Santeria religion. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 532 (1993), or by encroaching on the church's ability to manage its internal affairs, see, e.g., Kedroff v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am by Hannah Smith and Luke Goodrich
” And the Court expanded on this rule in 1993 in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
" In Lukumi Babalu, the City of Hialeah's ban on animal sacrifice was not "neutral" or "generally applicable" because it banned the Church of Lukumi Babalu's ritualistic animal sacrifices while at the same time it did not ban most other kinds of animal killing, including kosher slaughtering and killing animals for non-religious reasons. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:00 pm
In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:24 am by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
Several conservative members of the Supreme Court have specifically repudiated reliance on legislative record statments when searhing for impermissible intent in the context of constitutional civil rights — Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in the Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah case, for example. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The Colorado court did acknowledge Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm by Marty Lederman
Later this morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in the most significant Religion Clause case of the Term, Fulton v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:08 pm by Corey Brettschneider
In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am by Jim Oleske
Verner case) and was bolstered by the court’s subsequent opinion in Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]