Search for: "Circuit Judges" Results 21 - 40 of 79,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 11:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
In May 2022, a divided three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit ruled in Jarkesy’s favor, holding, among other things, that the administrative courts, as currently constituted and structured, violate the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:54 am by Dennis Crouch
Vidal (Case No. 23-1231) I’ve previously written about this case which focuses the interplay between statutory provisions and old judge-made doctrines in patent law. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:59 am by Andrew Weissmann
She also noted, “The Fifth Circuit relied on the District Court’s factual findings, many of which unfortunately appear to be clearly erroneous. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
The Federal Circuit agreed with Elster, and held that Section 2(c) was also an unconstitutional regulation of expression as applied to Elster’s proposed mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:04 am by Abbe Gluck
"Elizabeth Burch, Adam Zimmerman and I have made the same arguments in much more detail here, adding our view about the public benefits of litigation that are lost when bankruptcy is used to fully short-circuit the process as it was in the Sacklers' case. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
The majority opinion summarized Judge Doughty’s fever dream: “The Fifth Circuit relied on the District Court’s factual findings, many of which unfortunately appear to be clearly erroneous” (see the details in FN4 of the majority opinion). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court, in an opinion by Judge Raymond Gruender, joined by Judges Bobby Shepherd and Steven Grasz, upheld the district court's denial of some plaintiffs' motion to proceed pseudonymously: This circuit has not directly addressed the standard by which a litigant may proceed under a pseudonym…. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
[So holds the Eighth Circuit, concluding that the plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged that the "Black Lives Matter" signs were private speech, rather than government speech.] [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:55 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allowed that order to stay in place while litigation continued. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Most recently with Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying Apple’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Only one court — a 2-1 panel of Ninth Circuit judges — ruled in the Trump Administration’s favor, but even that declined to find that the termination decisions complied with administrative law, holding instead only that the courts lacked jurisdiction to review them. [read post]