Search for: "Cisco Systems, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 3:44 am by Ben Vernia
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. reversed on interlocutory appeal a district court’s denial of telecommunication companies’ motion to dismiss a qui tam suit. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
  This question is likely still haunting Cisco following yesterday's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015).In a 6-2 vote (Justice Breyer was recused), the highest court in the United States overturned the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that held that the Cisco could run the "good faith" defence against Commil's claims that… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:15 am
Amicus briefs have been filed by patent lawyers for multiple organizations, including AARP, Amazon.com, Inc.,  Cisco Systems, Inc., Dell Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:44 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; or (3) the October 16-17, 2007 postings on www.trolltracker.blogspot.com. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
There are many patent trials in the U.S. every year, and one can't judge the system only by the outliers. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Cisco Systems provide a good introduction to the debates Jesner has generated in the lower courts. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Compaq Computer the Federal Circuit affirmed in part the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruling that Compaq Computer Corp., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am by John Bellinger, Andy Wang
Cisco, a suit filed by a group of Chinese dissidents against Cisco Systems, the California-based Internet technology provider, and its CEO, John Chambers, for allegedly aiding and abetting the arbitrary detention and torture of the plaintiffs by the Chinese Government. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Patent No. 6,155,840 (“the ’840 patent”) and appeals from the stipulated final judgment in favor of defendants Citrix Online, LLC; Citrix Systems, Inc.; Microsoft Corporation; Adobe Systems, Inc.; Webex Communications, Inc.; Cisco Webex, LLC; Cisco Systems, Inc.; and International Business Machines Corporation (collectively, “Appellees”). [read post]