Search for: "Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
General Impressions: USPAP, Nichols, and the Supreme Court The Supreme Court’s decisions are the starting point for any constitutional issue. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
Pierce County, supra.The Supreme Court went on to explain that[d]issatisfied with the County's disclosures, Nissen sued the County in Thurston County Superior Court. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978) (in a case called Spino). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:35 pm
The suit was filed in Superior Court, the New Jersey trial court of general jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm by Andrew Langille
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court discussed the financial position of the parties, including defendant's superior earning capacity, and otherwise adequately explained its reasons for awarding counsel fees. [read post]