Search for: "Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
Young v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Docketing meetings, as the Commission does with only the briefest of summaries of what was discussed, does not provide ”the full administrative record that was before [an agency official] at the time he made his decision,” Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
” Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:34 pm
Gaiman v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
Much of this is set out in the seminal case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:04 pm
Rockland County argues that the panel's decision overlooks the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
" See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 3:18 am
" See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:08 pm
” See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
Noting that if Congress had intended the "extraordinary situation in which judicial review would reach to the very qualifications of agency officers for their policymaking positions, its statute would not be drawn 'in such broad terms that . . . there is no law to apply.'” Citing Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:48 pm
I. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Each case of disability access v. historic preservation must be made on a case by case basis - slightly different facts could turn a case like this in a different direction. [read post]
27 Apr 2005, 1:53 pm
A question also came up about how many states have adopted the federal "hard look" doctrine (a la Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
