Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by rplghannah
Superior Court on behalf of California counties in In re Elisa B. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am by Karen Gullo
San Francisco When: Friday, Jan. 14, 2022 at 9:30 am PTLivestream link:San Francisco Superior Courthttps://sfsuperiorcourt-org.zoom.us/j/86246849687? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:49 am by John Jascob
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco asked the Court to address whether the PSLRA stays discovery in Securities Act cases brought in state court, or only those brought in federal court. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 1:53 pm by Saira Hussain
In October 2020, on behalf of three activists of color, we sued the City and County of San Francisco for violating the city’s landmark Surveillance Technology Ordinance. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, August 27, 2021).The action at issue was filed in the California Superior Court, challenging statements made in a software company's IPO registration statement and bringing claims under Securities Act Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:14 am by John Jascob
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, August 2021).The question presented concerns Section 77z-1(b)(1) of the PSLRA, which provides, "In any private action arising under [the Securities Act of 1933], all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss, unless the court finds, upon the motion of any party, that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve… [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 49 Cal. 3d 881, 888 (1989); Louis at 987; Waidla at 730-31. [read post]