Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Trump"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
City and County of San Francisco as “improvidently granted. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 10:01 am
City and County of San Francisco, was the latest chapter in the battle over the 2019 rule, which expanded the definition of “public charge” – a term in immigration law for people who are ineligible for a green card if the government believes that they are likely to rely too heavily on certain forms of government aid, such as Medicaid or food stamps. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:08 am
City and County of San Francisco on the issue whether states could intervene to defend a... [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:08 pm
The petitioners in both City of Cincinnati v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
City and County of San Francisco, several of the justices seemed troubled by the Biden administration’s conduct and the prospect that the states may be left without any options in their effort to defend the rule’s legality. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:13 pm
The states (led by California) and the local governments (the city and county of San Francisco and the county of Santa Clara, California) echo a common theme: Arizona and the other Republican-led states have no right to intervene because, as a practical matter, this case does not affect them. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
She became “of counsel” – a designation for lawyers who are neither associates nor partners – in the Washington office of Morrison & Foerster, a large San Francisco-based law firm. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 4:07 pm
City and County of San Francisco to decide whether states with an interest in the dispute should be allowed to intervene to defend a rule when the United States is no longer doing so. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm
City and County of San Francisco, the justices agreed to decide whether a group of states, led by Arizona, can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration declined to do so. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm
City and County of San Francisco, California, involving an attempt by 14 states to intervene to defend the Trump administration’s controversial “public charge” immigration rule after the Biden administration declined to defend it in court. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
In City of Austin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
If the federal government successfully coerced jurisdictions such as San Francisco and New York City into assisting with federal deportation efforts, for example, that could create tensions between those jurisdictions and the countries to which deportees are being returned. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
, San Francisco Chronicle (Jan. 27, 2020). [read post]
