Search for: "City of Birmingham Police Department"
Results 21 - 40
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
In the spring and summer of 1963, national attention became riveted on Birmingham thanks to newspaper and television images of Birmingham police using police dogs and powerful streams of water against black protesters. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm
On 7 October 2019 Warby J held a PTR in the case of Birmingham City council v Afsar & ors. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Scott de le Vega, director of Interior’s Departmental Ethics Office, said the change was designed to ensure department’s 70,000 employees are getting consistent ethics advice regardless of which branch of the department they serve. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
City AM had a piece on free speech being threatened by tighter internet regulations. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:30 pm
Kansas City, Mo. police receive call about a burglary in Suite 200 of a building. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla (2012) Harini Iyengar84. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Samuels v Birmingham City Council, heard 31 Jan 2019. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Samuels v Birmingham City Council, heard 31 Jan 2019. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
Birmingham, 376 U.S. 339 (1964). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
On Thursday 31 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Samuels v Birmingham City Council. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Now Democratic operatives and a research firm known to have had roles in Project Birmingham are distancing themselves from its most controversial tactics. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
The case settled for over $200,000 against the city of Brazil, Indiana and the Brazil Police Department. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
The case settled for over $200,000 against the city of Brazil, Indiana and the Brazil Police Department. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm
The case settled for over $200,000 against the city of Brazil, Indiana and the Brazil Police Department. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
City of Laurel, Maryland, July 6, 2018, Gregory, R.). 5th Cir.: Burger chain’s public image didn’t justify ‘Fight for $15’ button ban The Fifth Circuit enforced an NLRB order finding that In-N-Out Burger violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA when it barred employees at an Austin, Texas, restaurant from wearing buttons supporting the “Fight for $15″ movement. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor, heard 13 Jun 2018. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor, heard 13 Jun 2018. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor, heard 13 Jun 2018. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Nottingham City Council v Parr & Anor, heard 13 Jun 2018. [read post]
