Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. County of Los Angeles (1983)"
Results 21 - 40
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2020, 8:30 am
” They sought a TRO against the Attorney General for the State of Arkansas (Rutledge); the District Attorney for the County of Merced, California; the District Attorney for the County of San Joaquin, California; and the City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California, restraining them from taking any action against them for their refusal to comply with Civil Investigative Demands or for alleged violations of the Arkansas Deceptive… [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am
County of Los Angeles, 482 U. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 267; Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:24 am
LEXIS 18838, Johnny Anderson, a tattooist operating in City of Los Angeles, desired to open a parlor in this beach city. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
§1983 at that time. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:43 am
Norris (1983); and Florida v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:53 pm
County of Los Angeles, No. 05-56467 California's maintenance of the California's Child Abuse Central Index (CACI), which is a database of known or suspected child abusers, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because identified individuals are not given a fair opportunity to challenge the allegations against them. . [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
County of Los Angeles, both of which indicate that the right of compensation arises at the time of the taking. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
B198118 In class action complaints against the County of Los Angeles alleging that the county imposed new utility user taxes without prior approval by the voters as required by law, and also raising a related equal protection claim, county's petition for a writ of mandate challenging certification of a class in the matter is denied as: 1) the rule from City of San Jose v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 10:59 am
Housing Authority of City of Los Angeles (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th. 267. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
City & County of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2014). [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
§ 1983 for an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
City of Los Angeles, No. 06-55817 In a civil rights action against the City of Los Angeles, the LAPD, and four detectives arising from plaintiff's arrest on murder charges and 162 days of incarceration prior to his release, rulings in favor of defendants are affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) dismissal of plaintiffs' case against one detective and of plaintiffs section 1983 claim against another detective was… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
