Search for: "City of Manchester v. Secretary of State "
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
An Oklahoma jury has ordered a former state legislator to pay $4.3 million to an insurance company in a defamation case. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Canada A top city official in Guelph, Ontario has filed a $500,000 defamation lawsuit against Gerry Barker, who runs a local political blog known as Guelph Speaks. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
On an A1 P1 defence: In Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 the House of Lords held that a local authority’s right to possession could be taken as read without any need to plead particular facts; I think that the same applies to mortgage companies. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
As the first ECLS annual conference held outside Europe, this year’s gathering not only benefited from geographic proximity to China, but was also enhanced by the cultural richness of Hong Kong, one of the world’s greatest cosmopolitan cities. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2… [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
In the meantime England have managed to retain (yay) and then lose (boo) the Ashes, so it just goes to show that there are worse things in the world than tardy blog writers.The issue in the two cases is neatly stated by Kitchin LJ at [2]:“The central issue on this appeal is whether the decisions in Manek and Desnousse continue to bind this court in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2… [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
He is not a state. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:24 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Sea & Land Power & Energy Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWHC 1419 (Admin) (29 May 2012) Bakhsh, R (on the application of) v Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust [2012] EWHC 1445 (Admin) (28 May 2012) Sreedharan, R (on the application of) v HM Coroner for the County of Greater Manchester (Manchester City District) [2012]… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
UCL, London. 25 April 2012: IBC Legal’s 19th Annual, Defamation & Privacy 2012, Crowne Plaza Hotel London – The City. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
City University London. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
City University London. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
Lord Irvine also identified what he called a more nuanced variant of this idea, in the Supreme Court’s judgment in what he called “the culmination of a notorious line of cases” on housing (covered in depth at Nearly Legal) Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am
Manchester City Council appealed the costs order, arguing that Mr Justice Baker (‘Baker J’) had made an error of law. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
