Search for: "City of New York v. Chevron Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
One judge (quoted in the New York Times’ Pulitzer-nominated series) called it “among the most profound shifts in our legal history. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
App’x 558 (6th Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S.Ct. 1228 (2016). [2] Id. at 570 (citing In re Chevron Corp., 749 F. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
App’x 558 (6th Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S.Ct. 1228 (2016). [2] Id. at 570 (citing In re Chevron Corp., 749 F. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), that petitioners’ property should be evaluated as a single parcel because, among other reasons, “the treatment of the property under state and local law indicates petitioners’ property should be treated as one when considering the effects of the restrictions. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
New York City’s Landmarks Law and the rescission process. 66 N.Y.U. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
New York City, 438 U.S. 104, (1978)’” (citations omitted)(emphasis added).]) [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm
The government argues that no genuine circuit conflict exists, but it does so only by ignoring the Second Circuit's reasoning in City of New York v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Chevron Corp., 10-1536, and Mohamad v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 8:05 am
" City of New York, 993 F.3d at 91–92 (quoting Illinois v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
City of New York, et al. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
City of New York v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Chevron Corp. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Michael Aubele, Valley News Dispatch, April 27, 2010 The federal Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department want a federal judge to sign off on an agreement with Allegheny Ludlum Corp. and Harsco Corp. intended to control slag dust at the Ludlum steel mill in Natrona. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
And bad news for Arizona in Ryan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Mackey Davenport v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– EPA News Release, July 28, 2010 The U.S. [read post]
