Search for: "City of Pasadena v. AT&T" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 11:44 am
City of Pasadena, No. 07-20013 Dismissal of plaintiffs' claims arising from defendant-city's refusal to grant them a license to operate a used car dealership is reversed and remanded where, contrary to the ruling below, plaintiffs' equal protection claim does not sound in selective enforcement and does not require a showing that the city acted with illegitimate animus or ill will. . [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:21 am
Update: In addition, the Court also granted rehearing of a petition for review that it had previously denied in City of Pasadena v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1 et seq., as held by this Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
Aug. 28, 2009)(Hecht) (disciplinary appeal, authority of hearing examiner, police officer, UDJA and jurisdictional issues) CITY OF PASADENA, TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:21 pm
"The road to change will be difficult, however.Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VII (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)o o SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]