Search for: "Clark v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
Lewis & Clark were legendary explorers and discovers. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Not only are high rates unlikely to produce commensurately higher tax revenues, but they discourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and productive employment. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
BNY Mellon Corp Trustee Services Ltd v LGB Capital & Anor, heard 21 March 2016. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
There is no dispute that Lindquist personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.Nissen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service then intervened in an effort to get labor and management to agree. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:32 pm
Clarke. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:48 am
Clarke [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that a taxpayer can only question Internal Revenue Service (IRS) [official website] officials about their reasons for issuing a summons when he can "point to specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
In an extremely brief and unanimous opinion by Justice Elena Kagan, the Court held that a taxpayer who wants to question Internal Revenue Service (IRS) agents about their motives for issuing a summons may do so if he can point to “specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:58 pm
Div. 2011) (citing Clark v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:49 pm
Clarke. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:49 pm
Clarke. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Clarke [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court heard arguments on whether an unsupported allegation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) [official website] issued a summons for an improper purpose entitles an opponent to an evidentiary hearing to question IRS officials on their reasons for issuing the summons. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
When Clarke refused to obey the summons, the government sought enforcement in district court pursuant to Section 7604(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, which provides that “[i]t shall be the duty of the judge . . . to hear the application, and, if satisfactory proof is made, to enforce the summons. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
Clarke (13-301) — when must a federal court hold a hearing to weigh whether the Internal Revenue Service acted improperly in demanding tax data by issuing a summons to a taxpayer. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 7:52 pm
Clarke 13-301 Issue: Whether an unsupported allegation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a summons for an improper purpose entitles an opponent of the summons to an evidentiary hearing to question IRS officials about their reasons for issuing the summons. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Clarke 13-301Issue: Whether an unsupported allegation that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a summons for an improper purpose entitles an opponent of the summons to an evidentiary hearing to question IRS officials about their reasons for issuing the summons. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Clark v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:03 pm
WERFEL, in his official capacity as Acting Internal Revenue Service Commissioner; and BARBARA L. [read post]
