Search for: "Clark v. Roy" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) Cruddas v Calvert, heard 9, 10 and 11 December 2014 (Jackson, Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ) OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The decision was controversial, with Roy Greenslade arguing that the prosecutions had little merit. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am by INFORRM
 Roy Greenslade had a piece about this here. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am by INFORRM
  As Roy Greenslade commented in the Observer, the British press was striving to balance freedom and responsibility. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade discusses a number of these stories on his blog. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
 heard 9 July 2014, (Arden and Christopher Clarke LJJ and Barling J). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
Clark Cunningham I highly recommend Jonathan Mahler’s The Challenge: Hamdan v Rumsfeld and the Fight over Presidential Power From the back jacket: “The Challenge is a rare achievement — a book as involving as it is important. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 26 March 2014, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulson) gave judgment in the case of Kennedy v Charity Commission ([2014] UKSC 20). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Elton John: The singer is suing the Times for libel over a story about his alleged connection to a tax avoidance scheme, as Roy Greenslade noted here and the BBC reported here. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Ct. at 3230 (quoting Le Roy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
A katpat to Roy Crozier (of the victorious Clarke Willmott LLP) for his prompting in getting this note up and running. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The FT reported here, Press Gazette here and the Guardian’s Roy Greenslade here. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
QOTM: Max Mosley, in conversation with Roy Greenslade: “I don’t see that anyone has the right to effectively put someone in the stocks, just because your sex life isn’t to an editor’s taste. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade took issue with the Independent’s Stephen Glover, who had argued “no private life should be entirely off-limits”. [read post]