Search for: "Clark v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services is not a State; so an Exchange established by the Secretary is not an Exchange established by the State; so people who buy insurance through such an Exchange get no money. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
Some said they had no problem with the product, while others didn’t consider it fit for human consumption. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
On Friday, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule that looks just like what it announced on January 20 – the very announcement that set off the recent firestorm. [read post]
Business and criminal law, health care reform, and chicken mole poblano and rosemary mashed potatoes
22 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
CLARK, Petitioner, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
, by Law and Lawyers Maya the cat, by the Free Movement blog Law Review on #Catflapgate: As the Cheshire Cat in Alice in Wonderland said…”We’re all mad here”, by CharonQC Clarke ‘regrets’ accusing May of laughable attack on Human Rights Act, by the Guardian Clarke hits out at ‘childish remarks’, by This is Nottingham “I want to scrap the Human Rights Act but Clegg won’t let me” [updated], by the UK… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Sebelius Court: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-2281 September 19, 2011 Judge: Seymour Areas of Law: Contracts, Government & Administrative Law, Native American Law This was the second appeal in litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services' (HHS) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe (Tribe). [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5163 September 13, 2011 Judge: Griffith Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Health Law, Public Benefits In a 2008 administrative appeal, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ruled that a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in Medicare Part C still qualified as a person "entitled to benefits" under Medicare Part A. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Sec'y of Health & Human Servs. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
HHJ Pelling QC, referring to the case of Crofton v National Health Service Litigation Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 71 , emphasised that he was not expressing any view as to the social and economic expediency of requiring a tortfeasor or his insurer to pay for the services that have or will be provided by the NHS. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
NLRB v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA2228
Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
