Search for: "Clark v. White"
Results 21 - 40
of 449
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On Thursday 26 October 2023 there was a hearing on meaning in the defamation case of Noel Clarke v Guardian News and Media. 5RB have more information here. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Clark, 19 F. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:45 pm
Even though Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Kimberly-Clark Corp., 756 F.3d 307, 312 (4th Cir. 2014). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
He has now taken testimony from two of the most important witnesses in the case, former Vice President Pence[1] and Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows,[2] and recently interviewed a third, Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.[3] Smith has also taken testimony from an array of other key witnesses including: former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone,[4] his former deputy Pat Philbin,[5] former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino,[6] former National… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
The jury that convicted him was composed of 11 white people and one Black person.As Justice Sotomayor noted, “During jury selection in this case, petitioner Tony Terrell Clark twice raised Batson challenges based on a pattern of racial disparities in the prosecution’s strikes. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
The amendment was only published the week before and was not subjected to any consultation, white paper or select committee report. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
Our second relist is a capital case, Clark v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:11 am
The post New Standard For Notice In FSLA Collective Actions: Clark v. [read post]
