Search for: "Clark v. Woods" Results 21 - 40 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am by MBettman
Clark, 767 A.2d 303 (Me., 2001) (the Maine recreational use statute does not apply to a claim alleging negligent supervision and instruction on the use of a wood splitter.) [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:40 am by Howard Friedman
He claimed in part that the restriction was imposed because he is a practitioner of Buddhism.In Clark v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.In Todd Allen Clark v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The United States has taken the next step in its trade dispute with Canada and asked for the establishment of a panel to examine its complaint regarding Canada’s administration of its tariff-rate quotas (TRQ) allocations for 14 dairy products.[1] In its request, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) [2] claims that Canada’s allocation of import quotas exclusively to “producers” violates the terms of Canada’s commitments in the schedule to annex 2-B[3] of the… [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
Throughout the decades, Sun Valley has hosted the likes of Ernest Hemmingway, Gary Cooper, Clark Gable, and Lucille Ball. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
  A split of this kind is highly unusual – the most recent example that we are aware of is the case of Sheldrake v DPP [2003] EWHC 273 (Admin) in October 2002 where Latham LJ and McCombe J were unable to agree and directed a hearing before a three judge court which took place 4 months later before Clarke LJ and Henriques and Jack JJ who reached a 2:1 decision (which was itself subsequently overturned by the House of Lords). [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
Clark, which I discussed here, involved the application of Crawford v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm by INFORRM
In taking this position, the Supreme Court has not only taken the opportunity to encourage judges and practitioners back to the general principles of Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 130, (where Sir Anthony Clarke MR made clear in para 14 that “over-elaborate analysis is best avoided” and “[t]he hypothetical reader is taken to be representative of those who would read the publication in question”), but also to convey its approval of the specific… [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]