Search for: "Clarkson v. Wright"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:26 am
Leslie Seldon Age discrimination is a topical for employment lawyers at the moment because this week the Supreme Court is hearing the case of Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes, another age discrimination case which will (hopefully) give guidelines on the circumstances in which it is permissible for an employer to require an employee or, in this case, a Partner in a law firm to retire. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
Starting on Tuesday 17 January 2012 in the Supreme Court is the three day hearing of the linked appeals of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
Key cases to look out for in 2012 Default Retirement Age and age discrimination (Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes being heard with Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes was about age discrimination and it not being illegal to make partners retire at 65. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:44 am
Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 899; [2010] WLR (D) 206 ”A rule providing for the compulsory retirement at 65 of partners in a firm of solicitors was a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims relating to recruitment and promotions within the firm. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (A Partnership) [2010] EWCA Civ 899 (28 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Kang v Eau [2010] EWHC 1837 (QB) (27 July 2010) Sternlight v Barclays Bank Plc [2010] EWHC 1865 (QB) (22 July 2010) Black Horse Ltd v Speak & Anor [2010] EWHC 1866 (QB) (21 July 2010) High Court (Family Division) Butt v Butt [2010] EWHC 1989 (Fam) (27 July 2010) … [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:20 pm
In Clarkson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:32 pm
Leslie Seldon, who spent 35 years at the law firm of Clarkson Wright & Jakes (CWJ), has appealed against the Employment Tribunal’s (EAT's) decision that the firm was justified in mandatorily retiring him at 65; the EAT has just been hearing his appeal. [read post]
