Search for: "Clayton Holdings, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 2:49 am
Applicant Bird Brain had the idea that it could register the term FIREPOT for "decorative tabletop torches," but Examining Attorney Cheryl Clayton issued a refusal to register on the ground of genericness. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 6:03 am
Nike, Inc. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc., 499 F. 3d 950, 954 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:13 am
Clayton Homes, Inc., No. 6:12-CV-49, (S. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:04 pm
Vonage’s recent deal with VoIP Inc. could help convince the judge to give Vonage more time. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 10:41 am
– Nampa Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
Nike, Inc., No. 11-982, to an appeal from the Second Circuit’s decision affirming the Southern District of New York’s holding that a covenant not to sue entered in a trademark dispute ended the case and controversy between the parties. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
Nike, Inc., No. 11-982, to an appeal from the Second Circuit’s decision affirming the Southern District of New York’s holding that a covenant not to sue entered in a trademark dispute ended the case and controversy between the parties. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:54 am
Marsh and Mclennan Companies, Inc., SC 17861 (Ct. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:51 am
Filed: November 20, 2019 Opinion by: Judge Clayton Greene Jr. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:59 am
” See Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
Qualcomm Inc., ___ F.Supp.2d ___ (S.D.Cal. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:47 am
It looks like the real estate slide continues, as these related entities filed Chapter 11 petitions in the Northern District - 08-69440-mhm 11 GT Architecture Contractors Corp Murphy Filed: 05/20/2008 Entered: 05/20/2008 … [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
UtilCorp United, Inc., 497 U.S. 199 (1990); because plaintiffs were “indirect purchasers,” defendants argued that they lacked standing to prosecute the antitrust class action. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
AT&T Inc. and Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:55 am
Connecticut Association of Schools, Inc., issued on December 16. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The panel cited the SEC settlement In re Munchee, Inc. as a good example of the type of cooperation that the Commission finds helpful. [read post]
