Search for: "Clements v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
See Roberts Rules for Order by Hendrik Hertzberg at The New Yorker (the image below is linked from the Wikipedia): In a nip-and-tuck 5-4 decision (read the opinion here) in a case formally titled National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
” Wired reports on Bowman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
Alabama and Jackson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
At the WSJ Law Blog, Joe Palazzolo reports that Paul Clement has advised corporate counsel to pay close attention to the outcome of United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
In Maples v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:46 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:38 am
" USA v State of Arizona, 9th Cir. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am
The Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am
The Court also denied cert. in several noteworthy cases, including Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:15 pm
I think there's a good chance that the Court will decide to grant Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Nelson, Michigan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:48 am
In another post for the National Law Journal, Mauro reports on a request made by former Solicitor General Paul Clement – who represents a group of former Justice Department prosecutors and civil rights officials – to argue on behalf of a criminal defendant in Connick v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
At Slate’s Breakfast Table, Paul Clement notes that the ruling in the patent case Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” As part of the same discussion, Paul Clement debates whether the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
USA Today’s The Oval blog provides Joan Biskupic’s report on Kagan’s appearance at the conference; when former Solicitor General Paul Clement and Erwin Chemerinsky of U.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Clements v. [read post]
