Search for: "Coan v. Coan" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court ruled in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
And when officers asked him to sing the alphabet, he got hung up on the letter "V. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 6:41 am by Howard Wasserman
Friday, February 3 Panel I: Judicial Decisionmaking (Mentor: Lee Epstein) Margaret Thomas, The Federalism Canons of Statutory Interpretation as a Constraint on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Nancy Leong, Making Remedies Elizabeth McCuskey, Clarity and Clarification: Grable Federal Questions in the Eyes of Their Beholders Paul Gugliuzza, Patent Law's Uniformity Principle and the Consequences of Judicial Specialization  Panel II: Judicial Capacity and Executive Action (Mentor: Susan… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am by Aaron Tang
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:16 am by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is  The Irrelevance of Writtenness in Constitutional Interpretation by Andrew Coan. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is Coan’s abstract: Arguments about the nature of judicial review and appropriate methods of judicial interpretation based on the "writtenness" of the Constitution date back at least to Marbury v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
Coan How the Conservatives Canonized Brown v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:59 am
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (1): In Shicotta Coan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
Coan has this editorial on Hein v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 2:21 pm
Coan reports here on Hein v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 1:20 pm
In this post at the Supreme Court Times Blog, Ross Runkel reports that Altadis USA, Inc v. [read post]