Search for: "Coca-Cola Consolidated"
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 3:31 am
The Coca-Cola Company, Oppositions Nos. 91178927 et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:14 pm
BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, No. 13-56126 and Sierra v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
In case you’re wondering about the status of the consolidated ZERO trademark oppositions brought by RC Cola (on genericness grounds) that Coca-Cola is currently defending at the TTAB, the parties are waiting for the Board to schedule a date for oral argument — this one might be worth attending, as I’ve written previously: [I]t remains to be seen whether Coca-Cola will prevail in the consolidated opposition brought by… [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:39 am
Yet, it remains to be seen whether Coca-Cola will prevail in the consolidated opposition brought by Royal Crown Company, perhaps its most significant challenge to date regarding the ZERO series of marks. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Rather than pocket the $10, you can reinvest it to buy more Coca-Cola stock. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:01 pm
Roma, século 2, dia 25 de dezembro. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:01 pm
Roma, século 2, dia 25 de dezembro. [read post]
20 May 2013, 9:54 am
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Paternity -- Sperm donors -- Trial court erred in granting parental rights to biological father with respect to child who was conceived through artificial insemination in “do-it-yourself,” non-clinical, conditions, where the sperm donor was the brother of one of the same-sex partners who were to parent the child according to unwritten agreement, but whose relationship had later soured resulting in the biological… [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
We hope all our readers had an excellent holiday-of-your-choice. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:31 am
By late afternoon, Teamsters Local 175 and Coca-Cola Bottling Company Consolidated (CCBCC) had settled a strike that had started earlier that morning. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
Come to Huaxi Village (IP Dragon) SIPO issues Amendments to Compulsory Patent Licensing Measures (China Law Insight) Coca-Cola plays it smart in its IP fight with Nongfu Spring (China Hearsay) Colombia FTA between Colombia and US (IP tango) Denmark Should costs be awarded for patent attorney assistance in patent litigation? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
The Coca-Cola Company, Opposition No. 91178953 [Consolidated Section 2(e)(1) opposition to several applications filed by Coca-Cola for marks containing the word ZERO for beverages, on the ground that ZERO is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning].October 18, 2011 - 10 AM: In re Sonex Research, Inc., Serial No. 77435929 [Section 2(d) refusal of SONEX for "internal combustion engines for manned aerial vehicles and systems," in view of… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:34 pm
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
Coca-Cola Co., 578 F.3d 1252, 1258 n.5 (11th Cir. 2009), and Romero v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Global Global – General World IP Day – Designing the Future (Class 99) Global – Trade Marks / Brands The Coca-Cola brand suffers a sharp fall in value as Google hits number one (IAM) ‘The Arrow Principle’ and fictional trademarks (IP Osgoode) Global – Patents Circular logic in patent analysis (IP Think Tank) Global – Copyright CopySouth releases the ‘Rio Papers’ (IP Osgoode) The truth about pirates and profits: A market failure,… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:45 am
Common defendants The Coca-Cola Company and Energy Brands Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 8:14 am
Other things besides words can serve as trademarks: the shape of a product or container (think the classic Coca-Cola bottle); the color of a product (think Owens-Corning's pink building insulation); even sounds (think the NBC television chimes). [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:03 pm
The district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction against the Coca-Cola defendants in Sinaltrainal I because Coca-Cola did not have the requisite control to be liable for the bottlers’ alleged actions, and in Sinaltrainal II the district court similarly dismissed the complaints against the bottlers for insufficiently pleading a conspiracy. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:35 am
Coca-Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
