Search for: "Collins v. Clarke"
Results 21 - 40
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
There is only one Supreme Court appeal in the second week of the Easter Term, commencing with a two-day hearing of Autoclenz Limited v Belcher and others to be heard by Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Clarke and Sir Nicholas Wilson on Wednesday 11 and Thursday 12 May 2011. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 3:32 pm
Reuben Clark Law School, as a “friend of the court” in Collins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:54 am
Law Lessons from LISA MICCINILLI (f/n/a COLLINS) V. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:32 am
Law Lessons from LISA MICCINILLI (f/n/a COLLINS) V. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:46 am
This point the Kentucky Supreme Court again emphasized recently in Collins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The second appeal in the Supreme Court this week is In the matter of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited (in administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 which is to be heard on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
Judgment The Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Collins, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) unanimously concluded that the employment tribunal was entitled to decide that the documents did not reflect the true agreement between the parties. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
Lords Phillips and Clarke find that the claim falls within the scope of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 3(1)(a). [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Supreme Court The main issue for the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Collins, Clarke and Dyson) to decide was whether the First and Second Complaints were based on the same grounds, such that the general principle that the same cause should not be brought against somebody twice (nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa) was engaged. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Also on 17 July 2023, Collins Rice J granted judgment in default to the claimant and McGee v Lewis [2023] EWHC 1813 (KB). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:15 pm
" Whenever you see a case like State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
To follow is the appeal of The Belize Bank Limited v The Association of Concerned Belizeans and others on Wednesday 29 June 2011 to be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note… [read post]
