Search for: "Collins v. State Compensation Commissioner"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
In my previous post, I argued that Collins was wrong as a matter of domestic law, and of European law, and that Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015) illustrated the EU law points and undercut the reasoning in Collins. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
As Noonan J in the High Court succinctly summarized Collins in Duggan v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2017] IEHC 565 (06 October 2017) [8], a breach of section 7 DPA88 “is not actionable per se but only on proof of actual damage”. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
Collins, who represents Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire, had claimed three MPs knew about child exploitation in the town but did nothing to intervene. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm
He pointed out that Hogan J in the High Court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), making the reference to the CJEU, considered that the constitutional right to privacy was also directly engaged ([20], [43], [47]-[56], [77]-[79]). [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:53 am
Related Blog Posts Subcontractor’s Employee Who Was Killed While Returning to South Carolina After Making a Delivery Was a Statutory Employer of an Upstream Contractor – Collins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
As to Collins, the Court said: 71. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:46 pm
In the recent case of Collins v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:46 pm
In the recent case of Collins v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Journalist Lauren Collins interviewed editor Paul Dacre (“he still doesn’t have a computer in his office“) and Mail Online editor Martin Clarke. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court held that the Commissioner's interpretation was, at a minimum, reasonable and entitled to deference, and that the relevant state law did not entitle the applicant in this case to benefits. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court held that the Commissioner's interpretation was, at a minimum, reasonable and entitled to deference, and that the relevant state law did not entitle the applicant in this case to benefits. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
Commissioner of Stamps (Lord Watson); Mahalakshmi Oil Mills v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, February 24, 2010 In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
