Search for: "Colorado Civil Rights Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 981
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, Scott Gessler, Petitioner's counsel, cited the Washington gifts, saying "no one thought that [the Clause] applied to George Washington. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But voter rights activists say the newest numbers, based on U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  And in the post after that one, I’ll address the remaining argument raised by the CRSCC (and some amici), which is based upon the First Amendment rights of Trump supporters in Colorado. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
” In other provisions of the Constitution where the phrase “officer of the United States” appears, Trump notes, it does not apply to the president – for example, the clause that requires the president to “Commission all the Officers of the United States” and the impeachment clause, which lists the president and vice president separately from “civil Officers of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Now she is on the hook to pay the city $750,000 to resolve civil penalties related to the matter, according to a settlement proposal. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
And the grounds for avoiding the merits are not credible: Colorado manifestly had the authority to determine Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Colorado – Supreme Court Says It Will Decide If Trump Qualifies for Colorado Ballot MSN – Ann Marimow and Patrick Marley (Washington Post) | Published: 1/6/2024 The U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, the author pointed to the Commissions Clause: The Third section of the second article declares that the President 'shall commission all the officers of the United States.' Of course nobody claims that the President has a right to commission a member of the Senate or of the House of Representatives. . . . for the president is bound to 'commission all the officers of the United States.' This we think is decisive. [read post]
In Thursday’s filing to the Massachusetts Ballot Law Commission, Free Speech For People and a Massachusetts-based civil rights firm contended that the Republican front-runner had, “through his words and actions, after swearing an oath as an officer of the United States to support the Constitution, engaged in insurrection or rebellion, or gave aid and comfort to its enemies, as defined by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Jeff Fortenberry, saying the decision to try the lawmaker from Nebraska in California over alleged foreign campaign donations violated his due process rights. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
The order will remain in place while abortion rights groups proceed with their lawsuit, in which they argue that Texas abortion laws violate their right to free speech and free travel. [read post]