Search for: "Colucci v. Colucci" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2023, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants’ bare assertion, that their recommendation of Rhode Island as the probate forum was a reasonable strategic decision under the circumstances, is not persuasive at this stage of the case (see RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 213 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
A FGV Direito Rio promoverá amanhã, dia 21 de maio, em parceria com a Câmara dos Deputados, uma audiência pública para debater a inclusão digital e o papel das Lan Houses no acesso à internet no Brasil, contando com a participação em video do Deputado Paulo Teixeira, com presença do Deputado Otávio Leite e de vários especialistas em inclusão digital. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:33 am
In Pease v Colucci, 59 AD2d 233, the court said that once an individual became qualified for a Section 207-a benefit, it continues until the individual recovers or reaches the mandatory age of retirement. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
The closest to reach the merits of a removal claim, Colucci v Canastra (130 AD3d 1268 [3d Dept 2015]), ruled that four shareholders of a corporation that owned and operated a golf course “submitted prima facie evidence” warranting a trial whether “there was cause for defendant’s removal due to his use of Hillcrest’s profits to pay for clubhouse operations that only benefitted him. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the breach of fiduciary claim arises from a different set of facts than the legal malpractice claim such that both may be sustained (see Exeter Law Group LLP v Wong, 2016 NY Slip Op 32425[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2016] [denying motion to dismiss certain counterclaims, including counterclaim for legal malpractice due to reliance on alleged negligent representations when forming business ventures and counterclaim for breach of fiduciary duty for disclosure of… [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The Supreme Court of Canada recently released Colucci v Colucci, 2021 SCC 24, setting out a clear framework for retroactive variations of child support. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Colucci, 2019 ONCA 561 (38808) Should support arrears be recalculated. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Cummings Fordham International Law Journal, Volume 29, Number 4, April 2006 Philip V. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Pease v Colucci, 59 A.D.2d 233, the court said that "Section 207-a of the General Municipal Law is a remedial statute enacted for the benefit of [firefighters] and should be liberally construed in their favor. [read post]