Search for: "Com. v. Courts" Results 21 - 40 of 2,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The US Supreme Court has rejected a bright-line rule denying applications to register trademarks comprising a generic term and “.com. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm by Laura Orr
Law in the News alerts us (on 2/3/12) to this provocative article: Colbert v. the Court: Why, in the battle over Citizens United, the Supreme Court never had a chance," Dahlia Lithwick, Slate dot com, Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012 Excerpt: ".... [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
Booking.com B.V.[1] The question presented to the Court was whether an online business's addition of a generic top-level domain (i.e., ".com") to an otherwise generic term can create a protectable trademark.[2] The Court declined to... [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
In response to Booking.com’s brief of February 20, the USPTO primarily argued that, 1) Goodyear Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:18 am
Com., one of the opinions released today by the Virginia Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 1:43 pm
However, the minutes reflect that discetionary review was granted in Com. and AJM, a child v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 1:36 pm
Com., which reversed (unanimously) the Virginia Court of Appeals decision en banc in Moore v. [read post]