Search for: "Com. v. Crawford, S."
Results 21 - 40
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2012, 3:37 am
They don’t worry about that stuff in the courts of appeals, either, so let’s take a look to see what’s happened there… In State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am
Okay, so I don’t like the 8th District’s work on hearsay and Crawford. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
It shouldn’t have come in; it’s hearsay, and it’s testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
Remember, just because a statement falls within a hearsay exception doesn’t mean it survives a Crawford analysis, and just because it’s an excited utterance doesn’t mean it falls within the “emergency” analysis in post-Crawford decisions… Good decision from the 9th in State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
France… It was a Crawford violation to allow the State to have a state trooper testify as to the urine results, rather than the toxicologist or lab technician who performed the test, the 4th District holds in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:34 am
The question presented in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:36 am
The 8th District’s opinion in State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:47 am
The picture was preferable to the 8th’s decision in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
I’m guessing that you’ve gone your entire legal career without having to know that, but it’s essential to understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in US v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
In the opinion in the latest case on that issue, last week’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
Last spring, in Connick v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
But that all changed with the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
The Supreme Court’s decision last year in State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:37 am
Let’s say you’re the trial judge in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
The 3rd District had answered “no,” holding that the right of confrontation, as interpreted in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Illinois, the Court will consider whether there’s a Crawford violation when one witness testifies about the results of DNA testing performed by a different analyst. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:38 am
There’s one criminal case on the docket for oral argument this week, Setzer v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Last week, I discussed the 8th’s decision in State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Those were some of the questions raised by State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
In the category of Least Unanticipated Events, we have the Ohio Supreme Court’s unanimous decision last week in State v. [read post]
